BBC News
November 22, 2021
The ensuing tussle between justice facilitators (lawyers) and justice distributors at the Asma Jahangir Conference in Lahore is a sign of a healthy trend.
We all need such debatable freedom so that the dust of hearts can be lightened and then this heart can come out of the lament of past and present and think of creating some meaningful rage of the future.
The conference also broke the stereotype that judges do not speak, their decisions speak. Now the judges speak and the decisions weigh the judges.
Assuming that the judiciary is not under any pressure and makes its own decisions.
Then there are Justice Munir, who introduced the doctrine of necessity in Pakistan, Justice Anwar-ul-Haq and Brother Judges, who sealed Bhutto's controversial death sentence, stubborn judges who swear and do not swear happily under PCO and Recodic and Steel Mills. Why does public opinion think differently about the decisions that have cost the national exchequer billions of rupees and then the creators of schemes like the Dam Fund and the fiery trial of Justice Qazi Faiz Issa?
Why doesn't the course from Karachi to Khyber and Lahore to Quetta resound that "judges are one under the shadow of this flag, all are one".
Assuming the army does not interfere in politics. These are the politicians who are trying to drag the army into the quagmire, then who pushed Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, Pervez Musharraf into this pool?
And why are these traitors only ordinary citizens, thinkers and writers and politicians? Why aren't there khaki and khak nashin?
Apparently not even martial law today. Even then, why are all the enemies of the government from PDM to Ashraf Karahi standing on the same platform? Who are these 'liars'?
If all politicians are not bad, then why don't those who are not bad come out of the queue and prove that we are not among those who are willing to pay any price for the chair placed on bricks. We are not among those who have no objection to the hijacking of the political process by those who play the role of the state within the state.
We are not one of those who have no grievances with those who are tearing apart power, except that when we were doing the service of Mr. Wala with a feudal spirit, what was the need to leave him alone at this age and forge another contract. At least they wouldn't have taken us out of the Haram.
In yesterday's political class, one or the other role model could be found. What politics is there today except that "the truth is good, but if someone else dies for it, it is better."
A country and a society where it is not clear who is making the decisions of foreign, interior and treasury, who is enforcing them, who is benefiting from them and who should be held responsible in case of reversal of decisions. And what to do after grabbing the collar?
I had heard about goodness that if you do it with one hand, the other will not know, but we have applied this saying to sensitive decision making.
In this environment, it has not been easy to understand whether Parliament is the sole decision making body or Parliament is just a building where decisions are announced by summoning the elected and elected area dignitaries or the real Parliament of any group of these five thousand staff There is a name that is both a law and a legislator.
What kind of a state is this that has a constitutional claim to legitimate use of force and no real concern about the privatization of power?
In 18th century Delhi, the king lived in the Red Fort and the rest of Delhi was sometimes invaded by the Mayawati, sometimes the Jats would invade, sometimes the Marhats would appear and sometimes the Syed brothers would remove one and put another king on the throne.
When the Subedars were in the mood, they sent some part of the tribute and levy to the court. When the mood deteriorated, the royal treasury was flooded.
The king, therefore, had no choice but to squeeze the craftsmen, the carpenters and the tax collectors further into the implantation of the royal style, as well as to heal the wounds inflicted on Anna one after the other.
I want to know the grave of the man who said that history does not repeat itself.
Comments
Post a Comment